Clarendon Foundation is a high tech
nonprofit organization that is supporting the deployment
of wireless broadband Internet access in 22 markets across the USA.
Network Planning Module for WiMAX: Maximum Achievable Data Rate
Courtesy: AWE Communications GmbH

Reconsideration of the Order for Two-Way Operation (1999)

Agency Action

Petitions for reconsideration and/or clarification of the 1998 MDS ITFS Two Way Transmissions Order granted in part, denied in part. Memorandum Opinion & Order, MM Docket 97-217, File No. RM-9060, 14FCC Rcd12764, 64FR63727, FCC 99-178 (Adopted July 13, 1999 by Report and Order).

FCC 99-178 Reconsideration Order

MDS and ITFS Two Way Transmissions (Amendments to FCC Regulations), 47 CFR Parts 21, 74 and 101, MM Docket 97-217, FCC 99-178, 64 FR 63727 (November 22, 1999). (txt) (wp)

Amended Rules for MDS and ITFS Two Way Transmissions, Federal Register Vol. 64, No. 224 (64 FR 63727)

Two-way transmissions; multipoint distribution service and instructional television fixed service licensees participation, 63727-63745 [FR Doc. 99-29785] [TEXT][PDF]

1999 Reconsideration Order (FCC 99-178)

Executive Summary

In response to petitions for reconsideration, the FCC amended and clarified the ITFS and MDS two-way service rules in order to provide licensees with increased operational and technical flexibility, and provided a mechanism for licensees to address any interference problems.
The Commission liberalized its interference protection standards to accommodate two-way digital transmissions in cellular networks.
An ITFS licensee was permitted to transmit its recapture time on channels not authorized to it, but that are included in the wireless system of which it is a part.
The FCC expanded its prior authorization of the use of channel swapping and channel shifting, which previously only applied to ITFS licensees using digital transmissions, to also apply to ITFS licensees using analog transmissions. ITFS licensees can shift its required educational usage to fewer than its authorized channels, so long as it provides the minimum instructional usage.
The rule changes were intended to encourage the development of advanced, digital communications services envisioned by the wireless industry, while affording other users of the ITFS/MDS broadcast spectrum protection from electronic interference.

The FCC clarified that ITFS “receive sites” on a “point-to-multipoint” network will no longer be individually “registered” (protected), since the ITFS “transmission facilities” are afforded automatic PSA protection for the entire licensed coverage area. The FCC refused to make an exception to the PSA protection rules for “point-to-point” ITFS stations.

Permit use of a high-power booster stations for digital and/or analog modulation and clarify that two-way operations are not a prerequisite for licensing a high-power booster.
Allow ITFS excess-capacity lessees to apply for booster stations on ITFS frequencies if (1) they have the written consent of the main station licensee and (2) the lease contains a provision that requires the lessee to offer to assign the booster licenses to the main station licensee for purely nominal consideration upon lease termination.
The FCC expanded the limited exception to the Protected Service Area Definition for License Modifications. Under FCC Rules, a modifying applicant may secure a waiver of the expanded 35 mile Protected Service Area (PSA) and maintain ‘‘grandfathered’’ interference, provided that the predicted interference does not occur within the 710 square mile PSA of the desired station. This exception was expanded for any modification not resulting in new interference to the station’s PSA nor increasing the size of the area suffering harmful interference. The exception was also expanded to cover any modification application where either the modifying or desired station was proposed after the effective date of the expanded PSA.

ITFS licensees carrying television programming were permitted to alternate between providing service on a “common carrier” (as a communication company that provides facilities for transmission, but does not originate messages) and non-common carrier basis. When acting as a common carrier regulation, the ITFS licensee must (1) control the operation of all receiving facilities, including the equipment needed to convert the signal to a standard television channel, and (2) notify its customers in advance of any discontinuance or reduction in service. The licensee must also notify the FCC and state whether it has any affiliation or relationship to any “intended or likely subscriber or program originator.”

The FCC had previously extended the maximum term for a lease from 10 years to 15 years and allowed leases in effect prior to the ruling (“grandfathered” leases) with automatic lease term extensions to continue for the maximum 15 year term (initial term of 10 years + 5 years of the 10 year renewal term). The FCC clarified that a lease that contains a provision to automatically extend a 10-year initial term (formerly the maximum allowable term) to “the maximum allowed by the Commission,” did not loose its “grandfathered” status. This is to prevent any need for a mass renegotiation of existing leases. The FCC also clarified that a provision that simply automatically renewed the lease did not protect the leases grandfathered status. This is to prevent leases from being grandfathered into perpetuity.

Amendment and Clarification of Two-Way Rules

Comparison of Provisions on Select Issues

1998 Two-Way Order

1999 Reconsideration Order

Streamlined Application System

Adopt a streamlined application processing system for
digital ITFS modifications that substantially shifts review of applications for new or modified response station hubs, boosters or downstream operations away from Commission staff and requires that the licensees resolve any potential interference issues.
Expand the streamlined application system adopted in the two-way order to cover analog ITFS modification applications.

Permit applications for traditional return-path use of the 125 kHz I channels to filed under the streamlined application system.

Interference Complaints

Require a ‘‘documented complaint’’ be filed with the FCC
in the event of non-consensual interference as a
prerequisite for the issuance of a mandatory shut-down
order to an allegedly interfering station.
The complainant must contact the operator of the allegedly offending facility and attempt to resolve the situation before filing a complaint.

The complaint must specify the nature of the interference, whether the interference is constant or intermittent, when the interference began and the sites most likely to be causing the interference. Where possible evidence demonstrating the effects of the interference should be included.

The complaint must contain a motion for a temporary order that the interfering station cease transmitting. The complained against party will have 2 business days from the date of filing to respond. The burden of proof lies on the complained against party. If the FCC issues an order for an immediate shut-down of a facility, the operator must submit proof that the interference has been cured before it will be allowed to recommence operations.

Registration of ITFS Receive Sites

Granted each ITFS licensee a 35-mile protected service area (‘‘PSA’’) and granted individual protection to all receive sites registered through the date of adoption of the 1998 Two-Way Order.
Announce that the FCC will not any longer register ITFS receive sites. Reject a request to rule that point-to-point ITFS receive sites are not entitled to a Protected Service Area, since that would place an unacceptable burden on ITFS licensees who wish to convert from point-to-point to point-to-multipoint transmission in the future.

Advance Notification and Professional Installation Requirements

Create a notification zone with a radius of 1960 feet around each ITFS receive site and required that the associated hub station licensee notify the appropriate ITFS licensee by certified mail at least 20 days prior to activation of any response station.

Require response station transmitters be professionally
installed to help prevent interference and to minimize the
risk of human exposure to potentially hazardous radio
frequency (‘‘RF’’) emissions.
Eliminate the notification and professional installation requirements for digital response stations in two-way cellularized systems utilizing no more than 18 dBW EIRP, contingent upon the operator of the associated hub station providing and installing replacement downconverters at registered ITFS receive sites with the outer edge to response station service area add beyond to a distance of 1960 feet.

Eliminate the professional installation and notification requirements for any response station operating with EIRP no greater than -6 dBW.

The problems of downconverter overload and unsafe exposure to RF emissions are unlikely to be experienced with the availability of improved equipment in the first case and the very low power levels involved in the second case.

Waive FCC rules to permit the use of omnidirectional antennae at any response station with an EIRP no greater than -6 dBW.

Amend FCC rules to permit an ITFS licensee to waive the professional installation and advance notification requirements in regard to its own facilities.

These changes will facilitate the installation of a very large number of response stations without the need for advance notification or professional installation, thereby cutting costs and making the service more affordable for users.

Channel Shifting and Swapping

Authorize the use of channel swapping and shifting in
systems using digital transmissions to give ITFS licensees flexibility in fulfilling their educational requirements.
Expand the authorization to permit channel swapping and shifting to all ITFS licensees, regardless of whether digital transmissions are employed.

White Paper